
'The Shape of things to come'
by
Jason Leigh
The highly rated NBC TV news-magazine: 'Inside Edition,' on July 20, 2001, made an erroneously incorrect statement, and or dogmatic statement, that 'ESP,' or 'psychics' had 'never been proven' to have been of 'positive assistance' with the police and FBI in the finding and closing of 'missing children' cases. This is, and was, a blatantly incorrect report--and 'Inside Edition' knew this at the time. Why did they lie to the American public--the same public, which trusts 'Inside Edition' and NBC-news as a whole--for presenting us with true and hopefully, correct news reports?
Was 'Inside Edition' ordered by the U.S. Government, via threats from the F.C.C. (Federal Communications Commission) to revoke their Broadcasting license--to mislead the public on a 'proven' reality, or 'ability,' which Inside Edition itself has reported on more favorably on in the past?
'Psychic Detectives' and 'Proven Clairvoyants,' such as myself, have 'proven' time and again to be of 'favorable assistance' to the police and FBI in 'missing children' cases. The 'Melissa Estrade case' down in Metairie, Louisiana, of 1988--1989, was 'assisted' by me--and was found to have been, "utterly amazing" (Sheriff Harry Lee), in the 'proven' clues, or details, related to these law enforcement agencies on that case, which was solved in major part due to the 'clues' given freely by me.
I refused 'publicity' regarding this case at that time, and insisted that I be 'unknown' to the public during my working with law enforcement on this case. I could have (and was found worthy) collected the offered cash Reward for information leading to the arrest of the guilty party--and without the information provided via this 'proven' clairvoyant ability: the case was not being solved . . .
So, why would Inside Edition and news shows such as it, continue to make positive reports of this nature--then retract such news stories later on by presenting it as being adverse and 'solidly' stated as fact by such Federal law enforcement as the FBI?
Despite many emails and letters from my friends, fellow believers and myself for the truth of these and other such matters: Inside Edition will not return our letters, nor will they address this issue, which they so proudly touted as 'positive' news in the past?
What we are witnessing--is the new form of Governmental control over, not just the major media, but of the control of the public masses in confusing the positive reality of this form of otherwise, 'strange science,' which the U.S. Government would choose to control by any means available to them--which would now include confusing the news reports with first allowing the truth to be made public--then by taking this truth away by blatant lies of misrepresentations of the otherwise; 'proven' facts.
This is 'The Shape of things to Come' in the major media: we will first be told a series of half truths to gain our attentions--until such time as too many people begin to believe what the media states as being something beyond the control of the all mighty influence of the government ('Freedom of the Press?), as then the controlling of the masses is transformed into a form of 'sedation by entertainment,' which was previously considered: news reporting of the 'truth' of a matter.
Are you going to stand for this to happen?
Peace in numbers---Jason
(c) July 29, 2001
* If you would desire your voice to be heard, send an email to 'Inside Edition' and DEMAND that the 'freedom of the press' not perish from this land by insisting upon 'correct news reporting' on this mentioned issue and others--for shouldn't you stand for the truth in the same land, which is bound by law to provide us with such--truths???
Emails for Inside Edition:
ietips@kingworld.com Mr. Matt Meagher (Investigation Unit Chief)
kwwebmaster@kingworld.com Webmaster
Update: It seems that not only does
'Inside Edition's' website have a monitoring system for in-coming mail deletion, but also: if their e-mail box takes on 'x' amount of e-mails: those e-mails are rejected and delivery can not be made by your mail server--as the e-mail remains
'undeliverable.' My e-mail was finally accepted by sending, as 'attachments,' the e-mails I had sent to the Investigation Unit and the General e-mail address to the 'Webmaster' address, asking that the Webmaster please 'forward' those e-mails on to the news-staff.
No word from Inside Edition as of 04/20/02.
![]()